Review of the theoretical aspects of the parentage test based on microsatellite marker evidence using extension language: Saanen as model animal models

Document Type : Scientific-Extensional Article

Authors

1 B.Sc. Student of Animal Science, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture at the University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture at the University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Today, for most experienced ranchers and genetic researchers, the importance and necessity of accurately recording the pedigree and relationships of a herd and livestock population are obvious. There are various reasons for the occurrence of errors in the pedigree and registration of relationships between livestock on the farm, which in this text are summarized and discussed. One of the proposed solutions in identifying the errors that occurred in the registration of the pedigree is to use the perspective of molecular markers. There are a wide variety of indicators for this important goal right now; however, due to the cost situation and the importance of cost-effectiveness of the method, in this article, only the use of microsatellite markers for parental testing is considered. With this research motivation, the present review article aims to transfer the experience regarding the theoretical foundations of the parent test based on microsatellite markers in promotional language using goat and saanan as the animal model studied. In such cases, from a molecular genetic point of view, molecular markers can confirm the accuracy of the information from a specific DNA sequence using various experiments. To achieve this goal, in the first step, blood sampling and extraction of the whole genome and artificial reproduction and artificial replication of microsatellites between suspicious parents and possible offspring belonging to these parents can be done. This manuscript tries to portray some of these governing rules and how to interpret the results to readers and interested parties and convey them in advertising language.

Keywords

References

بادبرین، س.؛ سید‌شریفی، ر.؛ خمیس‌آبادی، ح. و احمدپناه، ج. (1399). "بررسی پلی مورفیسم نشانگرهای ریزماهواره بز مرخز." فیزیولوژی و تکوین جانوری، (14)، 25-13.
عرفانی مقدم، و. (۱۳۸۲). "حفاظت شدگی وتوانایی ایجاد پلی مورفیسم میکروساتلایت‌های ESTدرتعدادی از گونه‌های مرتعی خانواده Leguminous." پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. گروه بیوتکنولوژی کشاورزی. دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان. اصفهان. ایران.
Barnett, N.L., Purvis, I.W., van Hest, B., and Franklin, I.R. (1999). “The accuracy of current dam pedigree recording strategies employed by stud Merino breeders.” Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Mandurah, Western Australia, July 4–7.
Christensen, L.G., Madsen, P., and Petersen, J. (1982). “The influence of incorrect sire identification on the estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values.” Proceeding of Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Madrid, Spain, 200–208.
Comstock, K.E., Wasser, S.K., and Ostrander, E.A. (2000). “Polymorphic microsatellite DNA loci identified in the African elephant (Loxodonta africana).” Molecular Ecology, 9, 993–1011.
Eggert, L.S., Ramakrishnan, U., Mundy, N.I., and Woodruff, D.S. (2000). “Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in the African elephant (Loxondonta africana) and their use in the Asian elephant (Elephas maximus).” Molecular Ecology, 9, 2155–2234.
Girish, P.S., and Barbuddhe, S.B. (2020). “Meat traceability and certification in meat supply chain.” In Meat Quality Analysis, Academic Press. 153-170.
Graber, R.A., and Morris, J.W. (1983). “General equation for the average power of exclusion for genetic systems of n co-dominant alleles in one-parent and in no-parent cases of disputed parentage.” In Inclusion Probabilities in Parentage Testing (Ed. by R.H. Walker, pp. 277-280), American Association of Blood Banks, Arlington, WV.
Grundel, H., and Reets, I. (1981). “Exclusion probabilities obtained by biochemical polymorphisms in dogs.” Animal Blood Groups and Biochemical Genetics, 12, 123–32.
Henderson, C.R. (1975). “Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model.” Biometrics, 31, 423-447.
Jakabova, D., Trandzik, J., and Chrastina, J. (2002). “Effectiveness of six highly polymorphic microsatellite markers in resolving paternity cases in Thoroughbred horses in Slovakia.” Czech Journal of Animal Science, 47, 497-501.
Jamieson, A. (1979). “Electromorphs and erroneous pedigree.” Proceedings of the XVIITH International Conference on Animal Blood Groups and Biochemical.
Jamieson, A. (1994). “The e effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members.” Animal Genetics, 25 (S1), 37–44.
Jamieson, A., and Taylor, S.C.S. (1997). “Comparison of three probability formulae for  parentage exclusion.” Animal Genetics, 28, 397–400.
Jeffreys, A.J., Wilson, V.S.C., and Thein, S.L. (1985). “Individual-specific‘fingerprints’ of human DNA.” Nature.
LONG, S.E. (1990). “Chromosomes of sheep and goats.” In Advances in veterinary science and comparative medicine (Vol. 34, pp. 109-129), Academic Press.
Cifuentes, L.O., Martínez, E.H., Acuña, M.P., and Jonquera, H.G. (2006). “Probability of Exclusion in Paternity Testing: Time to Reassess.” Journal of Forensic Sciences,  51(2),  349-350.
 Luikart, G., Biju-Duval, M.P., Ertugrul, Y., Zagdsuren, C., Maudet, C., and et al. (1999). “Power of 22 microsatellite markers in fluorescent multiplexes for parentage testing in goats (Capra hircus).” Animal Genetics, 30, 431-438.
Marklund, S., Ellegren, H., Eriksson, S., Sandberg, K., and Andersson, L. (1994). “Parentage testing and linkage analysis in the horse using a set of highly polymorphic microsatellites.” Animal Genetics,25, 19-23.
Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L., and Pemberton, J.M. (1998). “Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations.” Molecular Ecology, 7, 639-655.
Mrode, R.A. (1996) “Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values.” No. 3, Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International, USA.
Nyakaana, S., and Arctander, P. (1998). “Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in the African elephant, Loxodonta africana.” Molecular Ecology, 7, 1431–1439.
Reece, J.B., Urry, L.A., Cain, M.L., Wasserman, S.A., Minorsky, P.V., and et al. (2011). Campbell biology, No. 9, Boston: Pearson.
Slides Published by Jayson Parsons https://slideplayer.com/slide/8526371/ (Academic press, 2002)
Usha, A.P., Simpson, S.P., and Williams, J.L. (1994). “Evaluation of microsatellite markers for parentage verification.” In Proceedings of the 24th ISAG Conference of Animal Genetics, 25, 41.
Vaiman, D., Schibler, L., Bourgeois, F., Oustry, A., Amigues, Y., and et al. (1996). “A genetic linkage map of the male goat genome.” Genetics, 144, 279–305.
Van Vleck, L.D. (1970a). “Misidentification in estimating the paternal sib correlation.” Journal of Dairy Science, S31469.
Van Vleck, L.D. (1970b). “Misidentification and sire evaluation.” Journal of Dairy Science, 531697.
Visscher, P.M., Woolliams, J.A., Smith, D., and Williams, J.L. (2002). “Estimation of pedigree errors in the UK dairy population using microsatellite markers and the impact on selection.” Journal of Dairy Science, 85, 2368-2375.
Yeh, F.C., Yang, R., and Boyle, T. (1999). POPGENE Ver. 3.31. Microsoft Window-based freeware for population genetic analysis.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics